Evinced named a Gartner Cool Vendor for 2023
Learn More

Get Organized

Know where to start.

Traditional automated accessibility solutions can spew thousands of accessibility bugs onto your radar, and risk overwhelming engineering. So you want to prioritize. But with traditional solutions, it requires days and weeks of manual review to tell the important issues from the false alarms.

Evinced handles this automagically. We classify every single accessibility issue — by whether we’ve seen it before, by severity, and by components. This means you know which problems to tackle first.

Components

Our algorithms recognize when you re-use code for re-occurring elements like dropdown menus, buttons, etc. We call those re-ocurring code patterns “components." You can think of them as the root causes behind your accessibility issues.

And here's the good news: for most of our clients, a short list of components usually account for thousands of accessibility issues — well over 50% of the project, on average. Knowing these is a powerful way to organize your remediation plan. And it's only from Evinced.

“Three areas [of Evinced] stand out: clustering and root cause analysis, ability to track issues over time, and continuous flow analysis.”

Dir. Digital Accessibility, Fortune 100 Financial Institution

More ways to cut the clutter

Actionable reports

Our exportable reporting automatically includes screenshots for easy reference, along with details, priority levels, and specific suggestions for fixing each problem.

JIRA Integration

Once you’ve decided on a remediation strategy, you can export the accessibility issue directly into Jira for work tracking. The export automatically includes highlighted screenshots, css selector, code snippets, fix suggestions, and links to the relevant section of the Evinced Knowledge Base for further reading.

Component trends

Because our AI can cluster all the reported accessibility issues according to coding patterns, we can track trends associated with these coding patterns too.

Heard enough?